Zoho Premium Partner
Technical Proposal · SDP N° 02/2026 · IF-P00001 · ID 490.106 · IDB Loan 5940/OC-PR

Reengineering & Automation of Tax Processes Related to the Issuance of Digital Documents

End-to-end redesign of six priority processes in the General Directorate of Internal Taxes (GGII) — modelled in BPMN 2.0, validated on a live BPMS reference environment orchestrated by Zoho Qntrl, and delivered as a complete, reliable input for the automation of the DNIT tax system.

Contracting Party
DNIT · Paraguay
Selection Method
QCBS · 70 % technical / 30 % price
Duration
12 months · on-site, Asunción
Submitted by
Rede Corporativa
Zoho Premium Partner

00Contents

01Understanding of the Assignment

DNIT has consolidated internal taxes and customs into a single revenue administration. Within the GGII, several high-volume end-to-end processes remain semi-automated, dependent on paper and on the physical presence of the taxpayer or their authorised third party. The consequence is limited traceability, discretionary handling, slow response times and avoidable procedural risk.

Situation today (AS-IS)

  • Filings are presented on paper; supporting documentation is, in most cases, never captured into the system.
  • Case status is visible only for the DNIT area currently holding the file — there is no real-time end-to-end view.
  • No up-to-date catalogue of the procedures that can be processed by electronic file.
  • Form 10 operations are re-keyed by officers into Marangatu through a multifunction digital form.
  • Non-standard payment-facility requests, and foreign-trade cases, require in-person visits and manual posting.
  • Non-withholding certificates with active VAT/income obligations are processed entirely on paper.
  • Administrative-litigation cases are inventoried in spreadsheets — a direct risk of missed procedural deadlines.

Target state (TO-BE)

  • Information received, managed, processed, stored and delivered entirely by digital means.
  • Standardised, catalogued stages per procedure type — minimising manual intervention, error and discretion.
  • Electronic signature as a validation and security factor wherever applicable.
  • Real-time status for the taxpayer, operator, authorised third party and internal DNIT units.
  • Risk criteria and integrated risk-management linkages embedded in the flow itself.
  • Every action that must be recorded in the DNIT Current Account identified and posted automatically.
  • Complete capture of taxpayer↔DNIT, DNIT↔DNIT and DNIT↔third-party communications.
Scope discipline. This assignment is a process reengineering, modelling and specification engagement. Our products are AS-IS and TO-BE processes and subprocesses, diagrams, templates, step descriptions, functional specifications, use cases, interactive interface prototypes, draft decrees/resolutions, NRM-MECIP conversion, and the Process Manual and Technical Procedures Manual. The software build is the responsibility of a separate consulting firm, with whom we will hold frequent virtual and in-person meetings, as required by the Terms of Reference. Our differentiator: every TO-BE model we hand over is first executed on a live BPMS reference environment, so DNIT receives specifications that are demonstrably implementable — not diagrams whose feasibility is discovered only during construction.

What DNIT is really buying

A specification so precise, so legally grounded and so evidently executable that the automation firm can build from it without re-interpretation, and that DNIT itself can maintain and extend for years afterwards through the Technical Procedures Manual.

02Technical Approach & Methodology

We apply a four-phase, process-first method structured on the PMI project life cycle — initiation, planning, execution, monitoring and closure — as required by Section VII of the Terms of Reference. Methodological standards are combined by need:

BPM BPMN 2.0 BPMS PMI / PMBOK Lean Six Sigma ISO 9001 MECIP / NRM Agile co-design sprints

Continuous co-design with DNIT technical teams · iterative validation · knowledge transfer throughout Phase 1 · Discovery Kick-off, work-plan adjustment Regional office visits, AS-IS capture Legal & system inventory per process BPM/BPMN/BPMS training workshop Phase 2 · Design TO-BE modelling in BPMN 2.0 Business rules & risk criteria Functional specs & use cases Draft decrees / resolutions Phase 3 · Validation Executable blueprints on BPMS Interactive UI prototypes Integration proof-of-concept Joint review with automation firm Phase 4 · Transfer NRM-MECIP conversion Process & Technical Manuals Train-the-trainer workshop Final report & handover Taxpayer segmentation (small · medium · large) and Authorised-Third-Party treatment applied across every process
Figure 1 — Four-phase delivery method, aligned to the PMI life cycle required by the Terms of Reference.

2.1 · How each process is produced

For every one of the six end-to-end processes we execute the same repeatable eight-step chain. This is the "logical relation between activities" the evaluation grid asks for.

#ActivityContent and output
1Legal & system inventoryEvery legal provision that grounds the process, and every current system functionality supporting it, catalogued before modelling begins.
2AS-IS capture & field validationExisting processes (documented or not) walked through on-site with DNIT technical staff in central and regional tax offices.
3Opportunity analysisBottlenecks, paper dependencies, discretionary points, rework loops, control gaps and traceability breaks identified and quantified.
4TO-BE modellingBPMN 2.0 diagrams and templates: activities, events, tasks, conditions, handoffs, timing, data and forms, responsible positions, technology used, and the legal provision covering each step.
5Executable validationThe model is instantiated as a live blueprint on the BPMS reference environment and walked through with the business area — errors surface here, not during construction.
6Functional specification & use casesWritten to be consumed directly by the automation firm, plus interactive interface prototypes for each user-facing step.
7Regulatory draftingWhere the new process requires it, draft decrees and resolutions prepared by our Paraguayan tax-law specialist.
8Conversion & manualisationOutput converted to DNIT/NRM-MECIP formats and incorporated into the Process Manual and Technical Procedures Manual.

2.2 · Added value — benchmarked against leading tax administrations

Each TO-BE process is designed against proven international practice, so DNIT adopts what already works rather than reinventing it.

AdministrationPractice embeddedWhere it lands in the DNIT design
EstoniaOnce-only data principle; single digital identityElectronic File; taxpayer portal; elimination of re-submitted annexes
Singapore — IRASPre-filled filings; AI-assisted risk classificationTax Operational Procedures; risk criteria for non-withholding certificates
Australia — ATORisk-differentiated treatment of taxpayersPayment Facilities: automatic for standard regime, analysed for non-standard
Spain — AEAT (SII)Near-real-time reconciliation of obligationsCurrent Account: real-time compliance status (Cumplido / Incumplido)
Brazil — Receita FederalSystemically interlinked processesLitigation tracking automatically linked to audits, summaries, appeals, tax credits
Chile — SIIDigital certificates issued without human interventionBulk and individual certificate issuance under defined verifications

03The Technology Platform — What Each Application Does

Our BPMS reference environment runs on Zoho One, a single unified platform. This matters for a modelling engagement for one specific reason: it lets us prove an end-to-end process — intake, orchestration, rules, signature, document custody, integration and dashboards — in days rather than months, so DNIT sees the target state working before a single line of production code is written.

QntrlQntrlBPMS · orchestration · Circuits
CreatorCreatorlow-code apps, forms & rules
SignSignelectronic signature
WorkDriveWorkDrivedocument custody & versioning
CRMCRMtaxpayer 360 · communications log
AnalyticsAnalyticsKPI & risk dashboards
CatalystCatalystserverless functions & circuits
DirectoryDirectoryidentity, SSO, access control
FormsFormspublic intake forms
DeskDesktaxpayer support & SLA
CliqCliqinter-area collaboration
WriterWritermanuals & regulatory drafts
ProjectsProjectsproject & milestone control
DataPrepDataPrepdata quality & reconciliation

Role of each component in this engagement

ComponentFunction in the reference environmentWhy it matters to DNIT's specification
QntrlBPMS. Blueprints define stages, transitions and states; cards are live process instances; orchestrations invoke external systems.Turns a BPMN diagram into something DNIT can click through. Every stage, SLA and handoff in the specification has been executed before it is written down.
CreatorLow-code application layer: dynamic intake forms, the procedures catalogue, business-rule engine (Deluge), taxpayer portal.Lets us prototype the taxpayer-facing behaviour of each of the six processes and validate the rule set with the business area.
SignSignature workflow, signatory sequencing, evidence package and audit trail — used in the reference environment to model the signing step. The certificate itself is supplied by the accredited provider DNIT designates.Lets us specify, per step, who signs, in what order, over which document, with what evidence retained — while leaving the choice of accredited certification provider where it belongs, with DNIT. See §09 on legal validity.
WorkDriveDocument repository with versioning, retention and granular permissions.Proves invulnerability and custody of annexed documentation — a specific TDR requirement for the Electronic File.
CRMTaxpayer master record and complete log of every communication in every direction.Covers the requirement to record taxpayer↔DNIT, DNIT↔DNIT and DNIT↔other-entity communications.
AnalyticsReal-time dashboards over process, deadline and risk data.Materialises the performance indicators, statistics and reports required for the litigation-tracking process.
Qntrl CircuitsState-based orchestration engine inside the BPMS. Handles non-linear processes: conditional branching, loops back to earlier stages on rejection, and parallel execution of independent branches. Invokes functions and external endpoints as circuit states.Models the integration contract itself — the sequence, the branch conditions, the retry and the rollback path — as an executable artefact rather than prose. High-volume tax processes are not linear, and the orchestration layer has to reflect that.
Catalyst — Functions & CircuitsServerless back-end: Basic and Advanced I/O functions, event and cron functions, and Catalyst Circuits for concurrent or sequential function orchestration with conditions and data paths, behind an API gateway.Where the heavy integration work sits. Payload transformation, batching, throttling, idempotency, retry with back-off and error compensation against Marangatu, the Current Account and the customs systems are specified as functions with defined contracts — the form the automation firm can implement directly.
DirectoryIdentity, single sign-on, role-based access, delegated authority.Models the Authorised Third Party figure and the confidentiality controls for third-party and public-entity requests.
Document intelligence & risk services
engine selected with DNIT
OCR and layout extraction, document classification, and risk scoring — invoked as functions from a circuit state, behind a fixed interface contract.Connects risk criteria to integrated risk management as the TDR requires, without committing DNIT to a specific engine. Candidate engines are benchmarked on DNIT's own documents and selected on evidence — see §07.
DataPrepProfiling, cleansing and reconciliation of data sets moving between systems.Supports the current-account requirement that taxpayer operation records integrate cleanly, and surfaces data-quality issues during AS-IS capture rather than after go-live.
WriterStructured authoring with templates and controlled review.Production environment for the Process Manual, the Technical Procedures Manual and the draft decrees and resolutions.
ProjectsWork-plan execution, milestone control, deliverable tracking.Gives DNIT and the UCP live visibility of progress against the 12-month schedule and each package.

Zoho, Qntrl and related marks are the property of Zoho Corporation. Rede Corporativa is an authorised Zoho Premium Partner. The reference environment is a modelling and validation instrument owned and operated by the consulting firm; it imposes no technology obligation on DNIT and no dependency on the subsequent automation contract.

04Solution Architecture & Data Flow

A layered, API-first reference architecture. Qntrl is the orchestration backbone; Creator carries the custom logic and taxpayer-facing applications; and a dedicated integration layer — Qntrl Circuits for process-level orchestration, Catalyst Functions and Circuits for the serverless back-end — connects to DNIT's core systems: Marangatu, the DNIT Current Account, the customs systems of the General Directorate of Customs, and the banking network.

PRESENTATION ORCHESTRATION LOGIC & AI DATA & DOCUMENTS INTEGRATION / CORE Taxpayer Portal Creator · Forms · Sign DNIT Officer Desk Qntrl queues · Cliq Assistance Channel Desk · SLA · notifications QNTRL — BPMS Orchestration Layer BPMN 2.0 blueprints · stages & transitions · SLAs and escalation · inter-area handoffs · queues by taxpayer segment Rules Engine — Creator / Deluge validations · procedures catalogue current-account posting logic Document Intelligence & Risk Services OCR · classification · risk scoring engine selected with DNIT on benchmark evidence WorkDrive document custody versioning · retention CRM — Taxpayer 360 master data full communications log Analytics KPIs · deadlines risk & performance Signature layer — certificates issued by a provider accredited under Ley 4017/2010 Directory — identity, SSO, Authorised Third Party, access control signature workflow modelled in the reference environment; certification provider designated by DNIT Integration Layer — Qntrl Circuits · Catalyst Functions & Circuits API gateway · REST · webhooks · batching, retry, idempotency, compensation Marangatu(core tax system) DNIT CurrentAccount Customs systems(GG Aduanas) Banking network/ collection agents
Orchestration (Qntrl) Business rules Risk & AI Presentation · signature · identity Integration / core systems
Figure 2 — Reference architecture. Qntrl orchestrates every process; every process posts to the DNIT Current Account; every event surfaces in real-time dashboards.

4.1 · How data flows through a single request, end to end

  1. Identification. The taxpayer, operator or Authorised Third Party authenticates through Directory; the mandate is verified and the permitted operations for that role are resolved before any form is shown.
  2. Intake. A dynamic Creator form, driven by the procedures catalogue, collects exactly the data and annexes required for that procedure type. Documents land in WorkDrive; OCR and classification are applied on arrival.
  3. Instantiation. A Qntrl card is created against the correct BPMN blueprint. Stages, SLAs, responsible positions and the taxpayer-segment queue are assigned automatically.
  4. Automatic validation. Deluge rules verify filing compliance, obligation status and documentary requirements against Marangatu and the Current Account in real time.
  5. Risk evaluation. The risk service returns a score. Standard cases proceed automatically; cases outside the general regime are routed to the competent officer with the full analysis file already assembled.
  6. Resolution & signature. The resolution is generated from a controlled template and signed electronically; the digital document is issued to the taxpayer through the portal.
  7. Current-account posting. A circuit state invokes the posting function, which writes the resulting transactions — obligations, payments, surcharges, penalties, interest, guarantees — to the DNIT Current Account, consolidated into a single transmission where DNIT prefers it, with idempotency keys so a retry can never double-post an obligation.
  8. Traceability & notification. Every event, actor, timestamp, comment and document is recorded immutably; the taxpayer sees real-time status; dashboards and the risk-management function are updated.

05Application-to-Process Mapping — the Six Priority Processes

DNIT has prioritised six end-to-end processes. For each we state the automation intent of the TO-BE design and the components of the reference environment used to model and validate it.

DNIT processComponents usedAutomation intent of the TO-BE design
1 · Expediente Electrónico DNIT
Electronic file
Qntrl · Creator · WorkDrive · Sign · OCR · CRM A living catalogue of procedures defines, per procedure type, the standardised stages and the data and annexes required. Everything is received, managed, processed, stored and delivered digitally, with guaranteed traceability and invulnerability of documentation. Procedures better served by dedicated automation — Form 10 operations, payment facilities, non-withholding certificates — are separated out and routed to their own processes. Real-time status and the full communications trail are exposed to the taxpayer, operator, authorised third party and internal units.
2 · Trámites Operativos Tributarios
ex-Form 10 & certificates
Creator · Qntrl · Forms · Sign · Directory · Circuits Taxpayers register requests electronically and they are processed automatically or semi-automatically under verifications DNIT defines — return application, file annulment, return annulment or correction, correction of payment receipts, copies of documents, RUC unblocking, account clean-up, tax-compliance certificate under dispute, and further operations identified during the consultancy. A second, public-facing track handles requests from persons and public or private entities for statements of account, RUC certificates, tax cards, compliance certificates, copies of returns, closure/cancellation certificates and pre-printed-document certificates — individually or in bulk, with information-security controls and a legal review of confidential-information access when the requester is a third party.
3 · Facilidades de Pago
Payment facilities
Qntrl · Creator · Risk · Analytics · Catalyst Systematised, automated and digitalised for all operation types — including obligations originating in foreign trade, which today require an in-person visit to affect the current account before the customs dispatch can be settled. Full chain from entry through processing and approval to current-account posting. Risk criteria govern authorisation of requests outside the general regime, with a process manager recording the analysis and approval sequence. A dedicated subprocess monitors compliance, applying lapse criteria on instalment default, and feeds back into the current account.
4 · Constancia de No Retención
Non-withholding certificate
Creator · Qntrl · Risk · Sign · WorkDrive Both taxpayer situations unified in one digital process: those without active VAT or income obligations, and those with active obligations and credit balances who today must file on paper with documentary annexes. Digital intake with annexes, requirement validation, analysis, processing and issuance. Validity is redefined by tax type and the taxpayer's closing month rather than fixed at 31 December. Risk criteria accelerate resolution, and the process manager records the complete sequence of steps, actors, dates, comments and documents — both those submitted and those DNIT issues.
5 · Seguimiento de Juicios
Administrative litigation
Creator · Qntrl · WorkDrive · Analytics · Projects A single platform replacing spreadsheets, systemically and automatically linked to the precedent processes — tax audit, administrative summaries, appeals, tax credits — so that complete, consistent, current background is available to lawyers when they set legal strategy. Covers litigating-lawyer assignment, event recording with date, time and responsible party, incorporation of digitalised documents at each stage, deadline control and expiry alerts, and performance, statistical and reporting indicators by stage. Interacts with the Current Account where applicable.
6 · Cuenta Corriente DNIT
Current account — cross-cutting
Catalyst Functions · Circuits · DataPrep · Analytics Every action in the five processes above that must be recorded in the Current Account is explicitly identified in the process model, and consolidated into a single transmission where DNIT prefers it. The TO-BE processes register and update obligations automatically — payments, taxes, fees, surcharges, penalties, interest and enforceable guarantees, with the steps needed to establish enforceability; detect failure to file or pay on time and set compliance status automatically; integrate taxpayer operations with the current account so the tax statement is exposed visually in real time; and guarantee complete traceability of each obligation from generation to extinction — by payment, offset or prescription — linked to the documents, administrative acts and processes involved.
Coverage statement. Every process, every subprocess and every cross-cutting requirement in Section III of the Terms of Reference is addressed above with a defined activity chain and an assigned instrument — and each is validated on an executable environment before specification. This is complete coverage plus demonstrable added value.

06Qntrl as the BPMS — Modelling & Integration

The Terms of Reference require BPM tools including BPMN for modelling and BPMS for automation. Qntrl is where our BPMN models become executable: Blueprints define the process — stages, transitions, states and conditions; Cards are live process instances; and Circuits — a modular, state-based engine supporting conditional branching, loop-back on rejection and parallel execution — connect every other component and every core system.

Blueprints

Stages and transitions express each end-to-end process and its subprocesses, including conditional branches, mandatory fields per stage and the MECIP controls attached to each step.

SLAs

Time limits per stage with automatic alerts and escalation — the direct answer to procedural-deadline risk in litigation tracking and to response times across all six processes.

Handoffs

Teams and queues mirror DNIT's organisation and taxpayer segmentation (small, medium, large), so every inter-area handoff is explicit, timed, tracked and auditable.

QNTRL Blueprint · Card · Circuit Creator forms · rules · portal Signature service accredited provider · callback WorkDrive document attachment Risk & AI score on stage entry Analytics live KPI & deadline feed Core systems Catalyst functions · two-way
Figure 3 — Qntrl as the integration hub. Every connection is bidirectional: the blueprint invokes the service, and the service's response drives the next transition.

6.1 · Integration mechanics

InterfaceMechanismBehaviour modelled
Process → platform componentsQntrl Circuit states invoking custom functionsEach circuit state triggers a Creator function, raises a Sign request, attaches a WorkDrive document or writes to CRM and Analytics. The state machine stays visible to the business area, so the process owner can read the integration, not just the developer.
Non-linear process controlCircuit branching, loop-back and parallel statesRejection returns the case to an earlier stage without a new filing; independent verifications — filing status, obligation status, documentary requirements — execute in parallel rather than in sequence, which is what makes single-session resolution feasible at volume.
Process → Marangatu / Current Account / customsCatalyst Functions behind an API gateway, orchestrated by Catalyst CircuitsPayload transformation, field mapping, batching of bulk requests, throttling against core-system capacity, idempotency keys, retry with exponential back-off and compensating actions on failure. Each function is specified with its contract, preconditions and error semantics — the integration specification handed to the automation firm.
Core systems → processEvent functions and inbound webhooks updating the cardTrue two-way synchronisation: when the core system confirms a posting or a payment, the circuit advances the case automatically rather than waiting for an officer to check.
Bulk and scheduled operationsCatalyst cron and event functionsMass certificate requests, instalment-default sweeps and periodic reconciliation against the current account run as scheduled functions with their own execution log — outside the interactive process, so a large batch never blocks a taxpayer's request.
Risk evaluationFunction invoked from a circuit state on stage entryThe returned score drives the transition — automatic resolution versus routing to the competent officer — making the risk-management linkage required by the TDR explicit in the model.
Identity & delegated authorityDirectory, SSO, OAuth 2.0, scoped tokensModels the Authorised Third Party mandate: which operations a delegate may perform, on whose behalf, and with what evidence — to be reflected in functional specifications and use cases.
Audit & controlImmutable transition logEvery stage change, actor, timestamp and comment retained — the evidentiary base for MECIP internal-control requirements.
Standards exportBPMN 2.0 XML export and NRM-MECIP mappingModels are portable to any BPMS. DNIT is not locked to the modelling instrument used during the consultancy.

6.2 · Anatomy of a circuit

A circuit is the executable expression of the integration section of a process specification. The illustration below is the validation and posting segment shared by several of the six processes.

entry Resolve identity & mandate PARALLEL STATES Filing compliance function → Marangatu Obligation status function → Current Account Documentary check function → OCR / rules + join Risk gateway Resolve & sign automatic path Officer review human state · SLA timed Post to Current Account idempotent · compensable exit failure path — retry with back-off, then compensating action and loop-back to review; never a silent partial posting
Figure 4 — Circuit anatomy. Independent verifications run in parallel and join before the risk gateway; the posting state is idempotent and compensable, so a core-system timeout cannot leave an obligation half-registered.

6.3 · Why this layer, and not a lightweight integration tool

The choice of orchestration technology is a design decision we make deliberately and state openly, because it determines whether the specification survives contact with production volumes.

What a tax administration's integrations demand

  • Volume. Bulk certificate requests and mass reconciliation against the current account are batch workloads, not one-record-at-a-time triggers.
  • Transactional integrity. A posting to the current account either completes or is compensated. Partial writes on a taxpayer's obligations are not acceptable at any volume.
  • Non-linear control. Real tax procedures branch, loop back on rejection and run verifications concurrently. A single linear path cannot express them.
  • Operability. Execution history, replay of a failed run and per-state error visibility are what let DNIT operate the process after handover.

How the layer answers each

  • Circuits give a state machine with explicit branching, looping and parallel execution — the control structure the processes actually need.
  • Catalyst Functions carry the integration logic: transformation, batching, throttling, idempotency, retry and compensation, each specified with its contract and error semantics.
  • Scheduled and event functions keep batch and interactive workloads separate, so a mass request never degrades a taxpayer's response time.
  • Execution logs per state provide the audit evidence MECIP requires and the diagnostic trail the automation firm and DNIT will rely on in operation.

The point for the evaluation committee: this proposal does not specify integrations in the abstract. It specifies them at the level of state, contract, failure mode and recovery — which is the difference between a specification the automation firm can build from and one it has to reinterpret.

07Document Intelligence & Risk Scoring — Technology Options

The Terms of Reference require risk criteria in the processes and an explicit linkage to DNIT's intelligence and integrated risk-management functions, and the Electronic File requires that annexed documentation be captured and handled digitally. The Terms of Reference do not prescribe an engine — and neither do we. Committing to one before measuring it against DNIT's own documents would be an assumption dressed as a design decision.

We therefore specify the requirements and the interface, present the viable options with their real trade-offs, and run a comparative benchmark on real DNIT material during Phase 1. DNIT selects on evidence.

7.1 · Two different problems, frequently confused

Document intelligence

Turning a scanned or PDF filing and its annexes into structured data: optical character recognition, layout and table extraction, entity extraction, document classification. Success is measured as field-level accuracy on documents of realistic quality — not on clean samples.

Risk scoring

Deciding treatment — automatic resolution versus routing to a competent officer — from structured taxpayer data: filing history, obligation balances, economic sector, payment behaviour. This is a structured prediction problem, not a language problem, and its binding constraint is legal explainability rather than raw predictive power.

Conflating these two leads to the common failure of applying a generative model to a tabular problem, producing decisions that cannot be reproduced or defended. We keep them separate in the architecture and in the specification.

7.2 · Options for document intelligence

OptionWhat it isStrengthsConstraints to weigh
In-house / open source
deployed inside DNIT
OCR and layout models — PaddleOCR, docTR, Tesseract with layout analysis, or open-weight document models — hosted on DNIT infrastructure. Complete data sovereignty: no taxpayer document leaves DNIT. No per-page cost, so reprocessing and back-scanning are free. Models and tuning become DNIT assets. Requires DNIT to hold or build MLOps capability. Spanish-language and Paraguayan form tuning is an investment. Accuracy is proportional to that investment.
AWS
Textract, Comprehend
Managed OCR with forms and table extraction, plus entity recognition over the extracted text. Mature and strong on tabular documents. Well-documented. Regional presence in South America (São Paulo). Documents leave national territory. Per-page cost becomes material at DNIT volumes. Residency must be reconciled with the confidentiality clause.
Google Cloud
Document AI
Managed processors, including custom processors trained on your own document types. Custom processor training on DNIT's actual forms is the strongest option in this class for structured extraction. Good Spanish handling. Same residency question. Processor availability by region must be confirmed at selection time.
Microsoft Azure
AI Document Intelligence
Managed service with custom models — and, distinctly, available as a deployable container. The container option is the notable middle path: managed-service accuracy running inside DNIT's own data centre, so documents never leave national territory. Container licensing terms and a continuing dependency on a foreign supplier for model updates.
Zoho Zia
native to the platform
Classification, extraction and prediction services native to the reference environment. Zero integration effort in the reference environment. Adequate for triage and coarse classification during modelling. We would not specify it for field-level extraction from legal tax documents in Spanish. It is a convenience in our modelling environment, not our recommendation for production accuracy.

Options are listed for evaluation, not endorsement. Any selection must also satisfy the eligibility rules of the financing, DNIT's information-security policy, and the confidentiality obligations of this contract.

7.3 · Options for risk scoring

OptionApproachWhy it might be chosen — or not
Deterministic rules onlyThresholds and conditions codified directly from current regulation.Fully explainable, immediately auditable, no model risk. This is the correct starting point for every process, and for some processes it may be the correct end point.
Rules plus gradient-boosted model
recommended default
Classical machine learning over structured features — filing history, balances, sector, payment behaviour — layered behind the deterministic rules.What leading administrations actually run for tabular risk. Strong on this data shape, and each score decomposes into per-feature contributions, which is what makes an adverse decision defensible.
Managed ML platform
SageMaker · Vertex AI · Azure ML
Managed training, versioning and serving of the same class of model.Shortens time to production where in-house MLOps capacity is the constraint. Trades some control and cost for speed.
DNIT-owned in-house modelTrained and hosted by DNIT on DNIT data.Model, features and training data remain DNIT intellectual property, consistent with the intellectual-property terms of this contract. Highest long-term autonomy.
Generative model reasoning over casesA large language model judging whether a request should be granted.Not recommended for adverse administrative decisions. Non-determinism and the inability to reproduce a decision exactly are disqualifying where the act can be challenged. Legitimate uses exist — summarising a case file, drafting a resolution for officer review — and we specify it only there.

7.4 · The constraint that actually decides the design

A resolution denying a payment facility or a non-withholding certificate is an administrative act, and the taxpayer may challenge it. Whatever engine is selected, the specification imposes the same conditions:

Non-negotiable in the specification

  • No adverse decision is fully automated. A risk score routes a case to a competent officer; it never decides against the taxpayer by itself.
  • Every score is reproducible. Model version, input features and their individual contributions are recorded on the case record.
  • The feature set is reviewed to exclude variables that would be discriminatory or legally impermissible as grounds for differential treatment.
  • Human override is always available and is itself recorded, with reason.

Treated as a process, with an owner

  • Model drift monitoring and periodic revalidation defined as a named subprocess, not left to goodwill.
  • A documented threshold-change procedure, since moving a threshold changes taxpayer treatment at scale.
  • Performance reported by taxpayer segment, so a model that works for large taxpayers and fails for small ones is visible rather than hidden in an average.
  • All of the above expressed as MECIP internal-control requirements, not only as technical documentation.

7.5 · How the decision gets made — Phase 1 benchmark

Rather than assert an accuracy figure in a proposal, we propose to measure it. Included within the Month 3 report:

  1. DNIT provides an anonymised sample of real documents per procedure type, deliberately spanning the full quality range — clean digital originals through poor photocopies and mobile-phone photographs.
  2. Candidate engines are run against the identical sample under identical conditions.
  3. We report, per engine: field-level accuracy, table-extraction accuracy, error profile by document quality, throughput, projected cost at DNIT volumes, data-residency posture and contractual terms.
  4. We deliver a ranked recommendation with the reasoning exposed. DNIT decides.
  5. The interface contract of the selected engine is then specified for the automation firm.

7.6 · Why deferring this decision costs nothing

The process models do not depend on the engine. A circuit state calls a function with a fixed contract — classify_document, extract_fields, score_risk — with defined inputs, outputs, confidence semantics and failure behaviour. Changing engine changes that function's implementation and nothing else.

The consequence for DNIT: the selection can be deferred until the benchmark evidence exists, revisited later as the market changes, or made differently for different processes — without reopening a single process specification. Avoiding premature vendor commitment is a design decision, and we have made it deliberately.

08Process-by-Process TO-BE Design

Each of the six end-to-end processes is presented here with its target flow, our design approach, and the key interfaces and boundaries it depends on. Final deliverables comprise the complete BPMN 2.0 diagrams, templates and step-by-step descriptions for every process and subprocess, with functional specifications, use cases and interactive prototypes.

8.1 · Expediente Electrónico — Electronic File

start Portal intake identity + annexes Classify & index OCR · document custody Route by catalogue stages per procedure type Inter-area handoffs SLA · escalation Resolve & sign electronic signature Notify & archive communications logged Real-time status visible to taxpayer, operator, authorised third party and internal units at every stage · every communication captured · Current Account updated where applicable
Figure 5 — Electronic file. The procedures catalogue determines the stage sequence, minimising manual intervention, error and discretion.

Design approach

  • A living catalogue of procedures drives dynamic intake; each procedure type is a criteria-based path within one orchestrated lifecycle.
  • Everything received, managed, stored and delivered digitally, with real-time status to taxpayer, operator, authorised third party and internal units.
  • BPMN 2.0 model first; the executable blueprint validates the stage sequence before specification.

Key interfaces & boundaries

  • Legal validity of signatures provided by a certification provider accredited under Ley 4017/2010, integrated as a defined interface.
  • Document custody with retention and tamper-evidence; OCR and classification per the engine selected in §07.
  • High-volume document storage sized in Phase 1 against measured file sizes.

8.2 · Trámites Operativos Tributarios — ex-Form 10 & certificates

alta Registeredpublic form · line items Auto-validateDeluge rules simple?by operation Auto-approve Officer analysis Approved/Rej.notify PostedMarangatu interface yes — automatic no / third-party confidential → analysis & legal review
automaticofficergateway by operationcore-system interface
Figure 6 — Tax operational procedures (ex-Form 10). One multifunction request with line items for multiple operations; simple cases resolve automatically, third-party and confidential requests route to analysis with legal review.

Design approach

  • Each Form 10 operation decomposed with its own validation rules and auto vs semi-automatic treatment under DNIT-defined checks.
  • Two tracks in one model: an authenticated taxpayer track and a public-request track (statements, RUC certificates, compliance certificates).
  • Bulk requests handled through line items for small batches and an API/file path for large ones.

Key interfaces & boundaries

  • Real-time compliance status and current-account effects through the Marangatu interface.
  • Directory-governed access for the Authorised Third Party; confidential third-party access resolved with a legal-review deliverable.
  • Certificate issuance shares the document-generation component with the non-withholding process.

8.3 · Facilidades de Pago — Payment Facilities

Taxpayer /Auth. third party Automatedprocessing DNIT officer(by segment) start Digital request internal or foreign trade Pays initial instalment (digital) Receives signed document Auto-validate filing & obligation status General regime? Generate plan instalments & dates Sign & issue Post to Current Account + customs Subprocess: instalment compliance monitoring · lapse on default · feedback to Current Account Risk analysis file auto-assembled Analysis, report & approval by competence non-standard terms — sequence recorded in the process manager yes — automatic no
Figure 7 — Payment facilities. Standard-regime requests resolve automatically end to end; only requests outside the general regime reach an officer, and they arrive with the risk analysis file already assembled. Foreign-trade cases follow the same digital path, removing today's in-person visit.

Design approach

  • The DJ-origin, non-standard and foreign-trade intake variants unified into one blueprint with criteria-based branches.
  • Risk criteria route requests outside the general regime to analysis, with the sequence recorded in the process manager.
  • A dedicated subprocess monitors instalment compliance and applies lapse on default.

Key interfaces & boundaries

  • Plan posting and current-account effects through the Marangatu interface; the customs interface removes today’s in-person foreign-trade step.
  • Plan computation stays where it is authoritative; the process orchestrates and confirms.
  • Risk scoring beyond deterministic rules is optional, via the engine in §07; the gateway is designed to accept it without reopening the flow.

8.4 · Constancia de No Retención — Non-Withholding Certificate

alta SubmittedVAT / Income · annexes activeobligation? Fast path Validate + analyserisk criteria Certificate issueddynamic validity Notifiedfull case log no active obligation → auto-resolve Interface · document generation + e-signature
fast pathfull analysisgatewayinterface
Figure 8 — Non-withholding certificate. Taxpayers with no active obligation resolve on a fast path; those with active obligations and credit balances follow validation and analysis. Validity is set dynamically by tax type and closing month.

Design approach

  • Both taxpayer conditions handled in one flow with a fast path for taxpayers with no active obligation.
  • Certificate validity expressed as a rule table keyed by tax type and closing month, not a fixed date.
  • A complete case log of actors, dates, comments and documents retained throughout.

Key interfaces & boundaries

  • Certificate rendered by a document-generation component, shared with the operational-procedures process.
  • Signature applied where legally required, via the accredited provider.
  • Obligation status and credit balances read from the Marangatu interface.

8.5 · Seguimiento de Juicios — Administrative Litigation Tracking

PRECEDENT PROCESSES Tax audit Administrative summaries Appeals Tax credits automatic systemic linkage — no re-keying Single case platform complete, consistent, current background available to counsel Lawyer assignmentby matter & workload Event logdate · time · responsible Document incorporationdigitalised, per stage Deadline controlescalating expiry alerts Indicators & reports performance · statistics by stage Current Account interaction where applicable Traceability and centralisation of all case data on a single platform — mitigating omission, duplication and loss of relevant information, and reducing the probability of penalties or cases lost to unattended deadlines
Figure 9 — Litigation tracking. Precedent processes feed the case file automatically, so counsel never rebuilds a history by hand.

Design approach

  • A single platform, systemically and automatically linked to precedent processes — audit, administrative summaries, appeals, tax credits.
  • Litigating-counsel assignment, event log with date, time and responsible party, and per-stage document incorporation.
  • Deadline control with early, day-of and overdue alerts and an escalation ladder built with the tax-law specialist.

Key interfaces & boundaries

  • Links to precedent processes are hardened to integration only where a digital source exists; otherwise a soft reference.
  • Current-account read where amounts are relevant.
  • Performance and statistical indicators co-designed with DNIT’s litigation area so the dashboard reflects the metrics managers actually use.

8.6 · Cuenta Corriente — the cross-cutting data flow

Electronic File Tax Operational Procedures Payment Facilities Non-Withholding Certificate Litigation Tracking Posting points explicitly identified in each process model · consolidated DNIT Current Account obligations · payments · surcharges penalties · interest · guarantees Automatic registrationand update of obligations Non-compliance detectionstatus set automatically Real-time tax statementvisually exposed to taxpayer Complete traceabilitygeneration → extinction feedback to originating processes — validation against other processes
Figure 10 — Current Account. Every posting point is identified inside the process model itself, and feedback returns to the originating process for validation.

Design approach

  • One canonical obligation-event schema is reused by all five processes, so the automation firm builds a single integration rather than five.
  • Events are consolidated into a single transmission where DNIT prefers it, and real-time compliance status is fed back to the originating processes.
  • Every posting point is identified explicitly inside each process model.

Key interfaces & boundaries

  • Marangatu remains the authoritative ledger: obligation computation, real-time balances, offsetting and prescription stay there.
  • The process records, links and posts — it does not become the system of record for the Current Account.
  • This is the single largest technical dependency; its real capabilities are a Phase-1 discovery priority.

09Cross-Cutting Design Requirements

Seven requirements apply to every process. Each is treated as a design pattern applied uniformly, not as a per-process afterthought.

Taxpayer segmentation

Specific processes are developed for the management of all taxpayers, identifying the category — small, medium, large — so attention is segmented according to competences. Queues, approval competences and SLAs differ by segment; the process model is one, the routing is segmented.

Authorised Third Party

For every procedure we determine whether it may be managed through the Authorised Third Party figure, and reflect that determination in the functional specifications and use cases — including registration prerequisites, mandate scope and the evidence retained.

Electronic signature — and its legal validity in Paraguay

Applied as a validation and security factor at each step where it corresponds, with the legal basis for its use identified per step. We treat this as one of the critical design constraints of the assignment, not a technical detail: under Ley 4017/2010, as amended by Ley 4610/2012, only certificates issued by a certification service provider accredited by the Ministry of Industry and Commerce carry the legal effect of a firma digital. Our specification therefore distinguishes, step by step, where a simple electronic signature suffices and where a qualified digital signature is legally required; identifies the accredited provider integration point as an explicit interface contract; and, where the required legal effect is not currently attainable for a given step, states so and proposes the regulatory amendment through our tax-law specialist. This is exactly the kind of provision the draft decrees and resolutions are for.

Communications capture

Taxpayer↔DNIT, DNIT↔DNIT and DNIT↔other-entity communications relating to each request are retained, together with transmitted data and image material.

Integrated risk management

Each process is explicitly linked to DNIT's intelligence and risk-management functions, in support of the integrated risk strategy under the IDB programme. Risk criteria are expressed as decision gateways in the model, with the data each gateway consumes specified.

Legal grounding of every step

Each step carries the legal provision that supports it. Steps with no applicable provision are flagged and the required provision proposed; where the new process demands it, draft decrees and resolutions are prepared.

Interoperability between processes

Compatibility and linkage between related processes are verified jointly with DNIT's technical team, including entry and exit points for subprocesses executed by other entities.

MECIP conversion

Finished processes are converted into the models and formats established by DNIT, consistent with Paraguay's Standard Internal Control Model, and delivered as NRM-MECIP documents.

10Work Plan, Products & Delivery Schedule

Products are delivered against the schedule in Section IX of the Terms of Reference, with processes grouped into two packages according to the priorities and deadlines DNIT determines at kick-off.

MonthProduct / deliverablePrincipal contentsPayment
1Initial meetings and Work Plan adjustmentAgreements reached; prioritisation for development and delivery of processes and subprocesses; training-programme application; proposed themes for the change-management strategy; possible modifications to the DNIT process map; description of how processes will be grouped into packages; information DNIT must provide and by when; composition of the working teams, members and responsibilities. Reflected in the adjusted Work Plan.10 %
3Report on visits to tax and administrative officesInitial diagnosis from validation and capture of the processes executed in those offices, used to prepare and confirm the AS-IS processes; principal findings and opportunity areas for the TO-BE processes. Includes the methodology and BPM/BPMN/BPMS tools training workshop, delivered on real tax processes so DNIT teams work in step with ours for the rest of the project.20 %
6First package of finished processes and subprocessesReport, diagrams, templates and process descriptions in electronic format; functional specifications; use cases; interactive interface prototypes; draft regulations — all reviewed and validated by DNIT. Difficulties encountered and their causes; any work-plan changes and the agreement reached. Plus outlines of the Process Manual and Technical Procedures Manual showing structure and expected content distribution.20 %
9Second package of finished processes and subprocessesSame product set for the second package, plus a sample of the Process Manual containing finished inputs from the first package.20 %
10Preliminary final reportDraft final report with AS-IS and TO-BE processes and subprocesses, functional specifications, use cases, draft decrees and resolutions, Process Manual, Technical Procedures Manual and NRM-MECIP documents; delivery dates; personnel who developed each package; support received from DNIT; offices visited; meetings held with each working team and with the automation firm; difficulties and work-plan modifications agreed with DNIT. Includes complete drafts of both manuals.
12Follow-up, adjustments and Final ReportAll adjustments requested by DNIT completed before the end of month 11, updating diagrams, templates, descriptions, functional specifications, draft regulations and both manuals. Final training workshop for process-owning and IT areas, focused on the Technical Procedures Manual and on maintaining, updating and improving the end-to-end processes and the Process Manual. Final Report presented once reviewed and approved by DNIT.30 %

Observations on any product are remedied in full within ten working days of notification, with dedicated resources assigned to remediation while the rest of the team continues scheduled development. Delivery dates are set as key dates in the Work Plan; where a delay arises from circumstances outside our control, an extension request with justification is submitted by e-mail before the due date.

Meeting regime

11Organisation, Governance & Responsibility Matrix

The operating structure follows the Work Plan and adds the control bodies that the evaluation grid rewards at the highest level.

Steering Committee UCP · DGPCGI · GGII · firm's Project Leader — monthly Project Leader contract compliance · objectives · results Quality & Methodology Board deliverable assurance before submission Change & Communication Cell stakeholders · training · adoption Tax Process Team Tax Processes, Collection & Current Account Specialist Modelling Team BPM / BPMN / BPMS Modelling Specialist Legal Team Paraguayan Tax Law Specialist Experience Team UI/UX Design Specialist mock-ups & prototypes DNIT technical counterparts are embedded in each team — the co-design model required by the Terms of Reference
Figure 11 — Project organisation. Control bodies sit alongside the delivery line so quality assurance and change management are structural, not incidental.

Responsibility matrix (extract)

ActivityLeaderTaxModellingLegalUI/UXDNIT counterpart
Work-plan adjustment & prioritisationA/RCCCIA
AS-IS capture & office visitsARRCIR
TO-BE modelling & templatesACRCCC
Functional specifications & use casesACRCCC
Interactive interface prototypesACCIRC
Draft decrees & resolutionsACIRIC
Current-account posting pointsARRCIC
NRM-MECIP conversion & manualsACRCCA
Training workshopsARRCCI

R = responsible · A = accountable / approves · C = consulted · I = informed. The complete matrix, at task level, forms part of the Work Plan.

12Knowledge Transfer & Institutional Change Management

Training plan — submitted for DNIT approval

  • Thematic structure and duration in hours for each type and level of training to be delivered.
  • Preparation and supply of all didactic material required for in-person and e-learning delivery to internal users.
  • Workshop 1 — before AS-IS capture begins: detailed explanation of the methodology and the tools to be used for both AS-IS capture and TO-BE development, conducted on real tax processes.
  • Workshop 2 — on completion of the TO-BE processes: the new processes and their maintenance, updating and improvement, plus the Process Manual, delivered with a train-the-trainer approach.
  • Guides, manuals, specifications and online help delivered as reusable DNIT inputs. All training costs and materials are borne by the consulting firm.
  • Areas, units and participant numbers defined jointly with DNIT.

Change-management proposal

Organisational and system changes arising from process improvement can generate explicit or implicit resistance, which is a leading cause of project failure. We propose themes and points for incorporation into the organisational change-management methodology under Component 3 of the IDB programme, built on:

  • Leadership — visible sponsorship and a defined chain of change agents per directorate.
  • Communication — audience-segmented plan with milestones and feedback channels.
  • Commitment — early involvement of process owners in co-design, so the new process is theirs.
  • Understanding — before-and-after walkthroughs on the executable environment, which convert abstract diagrams into something staff can see.
  • Training — sequenced to the delivery of each package rather than concentrated at the end.
  • New ways of working — role and interaction changes made explicit per process, with adoption indicators, phases, milestones and report dates consistent with the technical approach and the 12-month term.

13Key Personnel — Alignment to the Scoring Grid (50 points)

We field the full mandatory full-time team. Each profile below is mapped against the exact sub-criteria in the Data Sheet, so the evaluation committee can award points without interpretation. Curricula and supporting certificates are attached in the Annexes; all personnel are available during DNIT's official working hours.

13.1 · Project Leader — 15 points

Sub-criterionMaxEvidence in our proposal
Master's degree in Project Management or Direction2Master's in Project Management — certificate in Annex A
University graduate2Degree certificate in Annex A
PMP certification or equivalent2PMP, current registration number in Annex A
Participation in tax-process automation and digitalisation projects in the last 10 years (3 or more = 4 pts)4Three or more contracts listed with client, scope, dates, country and outcome
Participation in modernisation projects based on international best practice (3 or more = 2 pts)2Three or more benchmarked modernisation programmes
Regional experience — tax-process reengineering projects (3 or more = 3 pts)3Three or more Latin American reengineering engagements

Responsible for execution of the consultancy in all its scopes, for contract compliance and for achieving the objective and expected results. Replacement, if ever required, is immediate and with an equal or superior profile, with full project knowledge transfer.

13.2 · Tax Processes, Collection & Current Account Specialist — 12 points

Sub-criterionMaxEvidence in our proposal
Degree in Economics, Business Administration, Accounting, Industrial Engineering or related2.5Degree certificate in Annex B
Postgraduate specialisation or Master's in tax, accounting or administrative matters2.5Postgraduate certificate in Annex B
Minimum 8 years' verifiable experience in tax, administration or accounting (more than 10 years = 2.5 pts)2.5More than 10 years, with employment certificates
Experience formulating or managing projects linked to tax processes (3 or more = 2.5 pts)2.5Three or more projects at international, regional or national level
Regional experience — Latin American tax reengineering or modernisation (3 or more = 2 pts)2Three or more Latin American engagements

Transfers expertise in collection, current account, taxpayer services and tax procedures to the working teams during development and testing of the new operational processes.

13.3 · Process Modelling & Automation Specialist (BPM/BPMN/BPMS) — 10 points

Sub-criterionMaxEvidence in our proposal
Degree in Economics, Business Administration, Industrial Engineering, Accounting or related1.5Degree certificate in Annex C
Certification or Master's in process management, automation or process modelling2.5BPM certification in Annex C
Minimum 7 years redesigning, modelling and implementing processes with BPM/BPMN/BPMS tools (more than 10 years = 2 pts)2More than 10 years, tools listed by engagement
Participation in tax-process improvement, optimisation, redesign, reengineering or automation projects (3 or more = 3 pts)3Three or more tax-process engagements
Regional experience — partial or total tax-process reengineering in Latin America (3 or more = 1 pt)1Three or more Latin American engagements

Responsible for modelling the tax processes with BPM/BPMN/BPMS tools, including diagrams, templates, the description of each step of every process and subprocess, and their functional specifications.

13.4 · Paraguayan Tax Law Specialist — 8 points

Sub-criterionMaxEvidence in our proposal
Legal professional0.5Law degree and bar registration in Annex D
Master's, specialisation or certification in tax legislation1.5Tax-law postgraduate certificate in Annex D
Minimum 8 years' verifiable experience in tax matters within the last 10 years (more than 10 years = 4 pts)4More than 10 years in Paraguayan tax practice
International experience — minimum 6 years in tax matters within the last 10 years (more than 8 years = 2 pts)2More than 8 years with international exposure documented

Reviews the new processes, verifies that references to current legal provisions in each step description are correct, identifies steps lacking a legal reference and states which provisions must be added, proposes reforms where the new processes require them, and prepares the draft regulations needed for implementation.

13.5 · UI/UX Design Specialist — 5 points

Sub-criterionMaxEvidence in our proposal
Degree or engineering in Informatics, technology or related2.5Degree certificate in Annex E
Minimum 3 years' verifiable UI/UX experience within the last 5 years1.25Portfolio and employment certificates
Minimum 3 years with prototyping tools — Figma, InVision, Sketch, Adobe XD1.25Tool-specific evidence per project

Responsible for designing the mock-ups and interactive prototypes that illustrate how the user interfaces will work, producing designs, images, sketches and tables.

Before submission: replace the evidence column with the named expert, the specific certificate reference and the exact project count per line. The grid awards points on documented thresholds — three or more projects, more than ten years — so every claim must be traceable to a certificate or reference letter in the annex. A key expert scoring zero does not disqualify the proposal, but if the bid wins, that person must be substituted at contract negotiation and re-evaluated against the same grid.

14Firm Experience (Criterion 1.1 — 10 points)

30 yrs

in process reengineering, project delivery, enterprise software and applied AI across telecommunications, ERP and public-sector transformation.

8 yrs

delivering complete platform transformations end to end — operations, finance, service, analytics and low-code process automation — as a Zoho Premium Partner.

3+

tax-process reengineering, automation or digitalisation projects in Latin America — the documented threshold for maximum points under 1.1.1 and 1.1.2.

Reference portfolio

AENA · Banco Santander · Cosentino · Telefónica · Santos Brasil · Prodynamic, among others — including engagements involving tax and revenue processes and the cross-referencing of taxpayer data at scale.

Sub-criterionMaxThresholdWhat the annex must show per contract
1.1.1 Tax-process reengineering, automation or digitalisation projects in the last 10 years53 or more projects = 5 pointsClient, scope, start and end dates, country, outcome, and a reference letter or completion certificate. A single contract satisfying more than one criterion may be scored under each.
1.1.2 The same, in Latin American countries53 or more projects = 5 points

Subcontracting of the awarded services is not permitted; association is possible only among short-listed firms. Our proposal is presented on that basis.

15Point-by-Point Scoring Alignment

The technical proposal is constructed against the grid in the Data Sheet. Technical score weighs 70 %, price 30 %.

CriterionMaxWhere this proposal answers itTarget
1.1 Firm experience10§14 — 3+ projects in the last 10 years and 3+ in Latin America, with references
1.2 Logic of technical approach & methodology20§02, §04–§09 — complete coverage of every scope element, logical activity chain, detailed description of how each will be fulfilled, plus demonstrable added value
1.3 Work plan10§10 — activities, content, duration, phases, interrelations, milestones, DNIT provisional approvals and report delivery dates, consistent with the approach and the 12-month term
1.4 Organisation & staffing — technical and qualitative5§11 — coherent organisation chart plus control bodies and committees supporting management, which is the "very satisfactory" threshold
1.4 i · Knowledge-transfer programme3§12 — covers every scope area, involves all DNIT staff requiring training, includes everything the TDR requires
1.4 ii · Institutional change-management plan2§12 — plan and methodology with activities, duration, phases, interrelations, milestones and report dates, consistent with the approach and work plan
2.1 Project Leader15§13.1 — mapped sub-criterion by sub-criterion
2.2 Tax Processes, Collection & Current Account Specialist12§13.2
2.3 BPM/BPMN/BPMS Modelling Specialist10§13.3
2.4 Paraguayan Tax Law Specialist8§13.4
2.5 UI/UX Design Specialist5§13.5

Tie-breaking, where applicable, favours the highest score on key personnel and then on technical approach and methodology — both of which this proposal is built to maximise.

The message to DNIT is straightforward: we understand the six processes in the detail the Terms of Reference demand; our method produces specifications that are proven executable before they are handed over; and our team is assembled to meet every documented threshold in the evaluation grid.

16Administrative & Contractual Compliance

RequirementOur position
LanguageSpanish, for the proposal, correspondence and all products.
Place of performanceDNIT central offices, Asunción, with visits to regional tax offices agreed with DNIT. Personnel maintained in Asunción or permanently available to DNIT in Asunción, as Section IV requires.
Duration12 months from the start order; services commence within five working days of that order.
SubcontractingNone. The awarded services are performed by the firm itself.
Professional liability insuranceMinimum cover of 100 % of the total contract amount, valid for at least 30 days beyond contract expiry, presented within ten calendar days of signature.
Performance guaranteeSurety bond covering 10 % of the contract amount, under the same validity conditions, from an insurer authorised by the Superintendence of Insurance of the Central Bank of Paraguay or a foreign entity with a national correspondent.
Intellectual propertyOwnership of all materials and products developed — diagrams, templates, descriptions, drafts, use cases, digital files, support material — belongs to DNIT. Copyright and every other right over the reports, documents and all material produced or derived from the service vests exclusively in DNIT.
ConfidentialityAll processes, specifications, draft regulations, communications and reports are treated as confidential DNIT property and are not shared with any person or entity other than DNIT. The DNIT non-disclosure agreement will be signed, with the confidentiality obligation maintained after contract end.
Powers of attorneyNo predetermined form exists. A power of attorney is submitted for the authorised representative signing the proposal. Should the proposal be presented as a consortium (APCA), a power is required for the authorised representative of each member, plus a power for the representative of the lead member to represent all members jointly.
Consortium (APCA) eligibilityAssociation is permitted only among short-listed firms. All APCA members must satisfy the Bank's nationality criteria. The lead member and the joint-and-several liability of the members are declared in the proposal.
Electronic signature of productsSignature workflows specified against providers accredited by the Ministry of Industry and Commerce under Ley 4017/2010. Where a step requires legal effect not currently attainable, the required regulatory amendment is drafted as part of the deliverable.
Anti-corruptionCommitment Declaration submitted with the proposal; compliance with IDB policies on fraud and corruption.
Currency & taxesGuaraníes, national taxes included. The firm is responsible for all tax obligations arising from the contract.
Proposal validityMaintained for the period stated in the Data Sheet from the submission deadline.
Verify before submission: the exact submission date, time and place are set in Paraguay's public procurement system (SICP), not fixed in the request-for-proposals document. Confirm them in the SICP and against any addenda issued by the UCP before finalising the dossier. Clarification requests go to the Procurement Specialist at the UCP within the deadline stated in the Data Sheet.